California’s AB 1825 Sexual Harassment Training Mandates
AB 1825 (California's sexual harassment training law) is the first law of its kind to actually detail the requirements for effective compliance training, setting the standard not only for California, but for the rest of the country as well.
ELT's interactive sexual harassment training course exceeds the stringent AB 1825 California sexual harassment training requirements, as well as those detailed under Federal Law and other states, such as Connecticut and Maine.
Basic Provisions of California's AB 1825
Two Hours of Training Every Two Years
The deadline for the first round of AB 1825 training was December 31, 2005. Thereafter, employers must provide two hours of sexual harassment training to each supervisory employee, every two years.
50 or More Employees
AB 1825 applies to organizations that regularly employ 50 or more employees or regularly "receive the services of" 50 or more persons. (Independent contractors and temps are included in the 50+ number.)
New Hires and Promotions
New supervisory employees must be trained within six months of their assumption of a supervisory position, and thereafter, every two years.
High Quality Training Required
The training mandated by California's AB 1825 must be of a high quality, conducted via "classroom or other effective interactive training" and must include the following topics:
- Information and practical guidance regarding federal and state statutory laws about sexual harassment.
- Information about the correction of sexual harassment and the remedies available to victims of sexual harassment.
- Practical examples aimed at instructing supervisors in the prevention of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.
Failure to Comply Opens the Door to Harassment Lawsuits
A claim that an employer failed to provide AB 1825-mandated sexual harassment training does not automatically result in the liability of an employer for harassment. Plaintiffs will argue, however, that the failure to meet the new training mandates is evidence of an employer's failure to take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment.
ELT's involvement in the Blue Ribbon Advisory Committee for AB 1825 Regulations
Because of our recognized expertise in the areas of sexual harassment and discrimination prevention, the State of California appointed two ELT team members to the Blue Ribbon Advisory Committee tasked with drafting AB 1825. View more information on the regulatory drafting process and the text of the sexual harassment training regulations.
AB 1825 Requirements and ELT's Solutions
- Legal Expertise Required for Course Designers
- Interactivity Requirements
- Required "Help" Link
- Required Policy Incorporation
- Two-Year Re-training Requirements & Training Records
- Two-Hour Training Requirements
- Training Can and Should Address Other Types of Discrimination
- The Draft Regulations Do Not Require a “California-Only” Training Program
Legal Expertise Required for Course Designers |
ELT Solution |
|---|---|
|
The Regulations require that individuals who develop training materials ("trainers") meet certain qualifications. Trainers can be:
Employers who develop their own programs, or procure them from outside vendors, must be able to clearly demonstrate the active, hands-on participation of a true sexual harassment-prevention expert. This relates not only to a program's development, but also its ongoing maintenance. |
Long Term, Exclusive Relationship with the Nation's Preeminent Employment Law Firm. ELT was founded by California- based Littler Mendelson, the nation's largest employment law firm. The firm remains our exclusive content partner for employment-related training. ELT's relationship with Littler gives us access to a "brain trust" of more than 600 employment law specialists and the flexibility to include their attorneys in every step of course development, testing and updating. Because of the Littler relationship, we are also able to use course scenarios drawn from real case law, anticipate cutting edge legal issues, and always meet or exceed every regulatory and statutory mandate - including those imposed by AB1825 and its final regulations. As a result, our harassment solution can withstand intense legal review. In the event of litigation or a formal administrative proceeding, our ELT and Littler content developers are available for cross examination regarding their legal credentials, their practical experience in workplace harassment and their hands-on involvement in developing ELT courses. |
Heightended Interactivity Requirements |
ELT Solution |
|---|---|
|
The Regulations impose heightened interactivity requirements for all courseware, including:
With respect to e-learning, we at ELT believe this section of AB 1825 means that it is critical to avoid developing or purchasing programs that involve a one-way "information dump" or excessive amounts of passive reading. Every component of the program should be highly interactive and require the learner to constantly apply knowledge. |
Engaging, Effective Educational Design. ELT's Workplace Harassment course engages learners by using a story-based course with a believable plotline and characters. The evolving story presents learners with real-world scenarios that deliver your message and make sense in today's business environment. Interactive Exercises Reinforce Lessons. Our Workplace Harassment course also reinforces key lessons with interactive questions that must be resolved before learners proceed. In the standard supervisor course, supervisors complete more than 40 interactive questions and activities, ensuring they stay engaged throughout the learning experience. Supervisor's Resolve Real Life Situations. In the supervisor version, learners actually become part of the story through special simulations that present realistic workplace scenarios and then ask the supervisors to resolve them. |
Required "Help" Link |
ELT Solution |
|---|---|
|
The Regulations require that every online program must "provide a link to or directions on how to contact a trainer" for "questions and guidance." |
ELT's "Ask A Question" Link.An "Ask a Question" link is available throughout the Workplace Harassment course. To provide learners immediate and consistent answers to their questions, the link includes a fully indexed and searchable database of hundreds of frequently asked questions. To address questions that involve specific employer policies, or that may contain a complaint, the "Ask A Question" link can also include email links, links to other employee resources, Hotlines, phone numbers and directions to contact appropriate organization leaders. The information in the link also appears automatically at the end of the program, and must be acknowledged by learners before they complete the course. |
Required Policy Incorporation |
ELT Solution |
|---|---|
|
The Regulations require employers to cover the elements of their anti-harassment policy and address how to handle complaints. The regulations further provide that "regardless of whether the employer's policy is used as part of the training the employer shall give each supervisor a copy of its anti-harassment policy and require each supervisor to read and to acknowledge receipt of that policy." |
ELT's "Policies" IconEmployer's policies are available throughout the Workplace Harassment course under the "Policies" icon and appear automatically before learners complete the course. ELT's electronic certification screen also asks learners to confirm that they have received and read your policies – this receipt is tracked in our LMS. All policies are printable. Supervisors Are Encouraged to Report Potential ProblemsThe importance of reporting concerns or questions and understanding the specifics of the employer's complaint procedure is reinforced in ELT's Workplace Harassment course. |
Two Year Re-training Requirements & Training Records |
ELT Solution |
|---|---|
|
The Regulations provide that employers must track sexual harassment training for each supervisor using the Individual Tracking Method, the Training Year Method, or a combination of both.
Employers are also required to keep records of the training provided to supervisors for at least 2 years. The retained record must include:
|
ELT's Learning Management System (LMS) allows clients to easily track and report on individual learner training records and to schedule appropriate re-training. ELT's easy-to-use LMS can be quickly populated with an employer's user information for its initial training populations and includes several customizable fields that permit employers to run reports that make sense in their environments. ELT clients also have access to an invaluable resource - ELT's Implementation Managers. Clients are assigned an Implementation Manager to help them implement the course and support them throughout their agreement. |
Two Year Training Requirements |
ELT Solution |
|---|---|
|
The Regulations require 2 hours of training. Two hours of sexual harassment training is "two hours of classroom training, or two hours of Webinar training, or in the case of an e-learning program, a program that takes the supervisor no less than two hours to complete." The Regulations expressly provide, however, that "the training need not be completed in two consecutive hours.... E-learning courses may include bookmarking features." |
Timing Options Tailored to Your Workplace. ELT's Workplace Harassment solution easily meets AB 1825's 2-hour mandate.
BookmarkingWorkplace Harassment also includes a bookmarking feature that allows your supervisors to log out of the training program, and then return to where they left off. |
Training Can and Should Address Other Types of Discrimination |
ELT Solution |
|---|---|
|
The Regulations specify that the training must extend beyond sexual harassment to other forms of prohibited harassment and require that training provide "practical examples aimed at instructing supervisors in the prevention of harassment, discrimination and retaliation." Training can discuss "how harassment of an employee can cover more than one basis." These basis categories include:
|
Discussion of Sexual Harassment and Other forms of Discrimination and Retaliation.Workplace Harassment focuses on sexual harassment issues but also introduces learners to other forms of discriminatory conduct that often form the basis of claims, and also covers the retaliation prohibition. Workplace Harassment specially emphasizes "intersectional discrimination," how sexual harassment claims often intersect with claims relating to race, religion, disability and age. Intersectional discrimination has been highlighted by the EEOC in its 2006 Compliance Manual. Providing supervisors and employees with the broadest possible training, is an efficient use of resources, provides the strongest legal protections and makes plain, common sense:
|
The Draft Regulations Do Not Reguire a "California-only" Training Program |
ELT Solution |
|---|---|
|
The Regulations provide specific guidance on the type of training that must be provided. They do not, however, require employers to create a "California-only" training program or bar employers from including California supervisors in a national program that meets AB 1825 standards for rigorous, comprehensive sexual harassment training. |
A Consistent, National Training ProgramTreating AB 1825's training guidelines as a "California-only" phenomenon may be tempting. However, employers should treat AB1825 as a catalyst for the comprehensive training that is required across your organization.
|
Most Common Legal Landmines in Addressing AB 1825 Compliance
-
An effective, 50-state compliant training program should go beyond sexual harassment to address other, important protected categories, such as race, religion, disability and age.
-
While AB 1825 is a state law, all employers must continue to comply with federal law2 that strongly encourages effective harassment training for the entire organization. The US Supreme Court Faragher & Ellerth decisions, as well as the relevant EEOC Guidelines specifically require:
- Training on broader workplace harassment (all protected categories - not just sex).
- Training for all employees (not just supervisors) on a "periodic" basis. (Periodic is not proactively defined under federal law, but case law suggests training at least every other year.)
- The US Supreme Court Kolstad decision3 requires additional Title VII training for managers to prevent discrimination in hiring, performance management and terminations.
As a best practice, a consistent, national training program helps establish valuable legal defenses. As importantly, it sends a consistent message to employees about expected standards of conduct, maximizing behavioral change and risk mitigation.
-
Non-supervisory employees need training for three critical reasons:
- Federal case law suggests that both managers and employees must be trained to successfully establish an affirmative defense to harassment claims brought in federal court.
- California Government Code §12940(k) requires employers to take "all reasonable steps necessary to prevent discrimination and harassment from occurring."
- In State Dep't of Health Servs. v. Superior Court4, the California Supreme Court held that the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) does not allow the federal Faragher/Ellerth defense in harassment claims. Instead, California employers may assert a different defense under the FEHA – the doctrine of avoidable consequences. This defense allows an employer to limit damages by proving that it took appropriate steps to prevent and address harassment.
According to State Dep't of Health Servs,. to establish the avoidable consequences defense, a California employer must:
- Show that it adopted appropriate anti-harassment policies and communicated essential information to employees.
- Ensure a strict prohibition against retaliation for reporting alleged policy violations.
- Ensure that reporting procedures protect employee confidentiality as much as is practical.
- "Consistently and firmly" enforce anti-harassment policies.
The Court further stated that in establishing the avoidable consequences defense, potentially relevant evidence includes "anything tending to show that the employer took effective steps" to encourage individuals to report harassment and for the employer to respond effectively.
None of these factors are limited to supervisors. This broader directive strongly supports training for both employees and managers.
-
Even if a training deadline has just ended, the next cycle of required training will be at hand for most organizations. Employers must evaluate their training needs and existing programs now so that:
- The sexual harassment training provided to supervisors in the next training cycle fully complies with AB 1825 and its regulations.
- Newly hired and newly promoted supervisors receive AB 1825 compliant training.
- Employers needing additional compliance solutions will have sufficient time to evaluate, procure, and roll out a program. The procurement process often requires buy-in from multiple constituencies and typically takes from 2-6 months. Also, once a sexual harassment training program is developed or purchased, time is also required to actually roll out and complete the training.
1. Training Only on Sexual Harassment and Excluding Broader Forms of Workplace Harassment
2. Training Only in California
3. Training Only Managers
4. Delaying Implementation of a Solution that Meets the Regulatory Requirements
- 1 Faragher v City of Boca Raton, 118 S Ct 2275 (1998); Burlington Industries, Inc. v Ellerth, 118 S Ct 2257 (1998). Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors (6/18/99).
- 2 Supra note #1.
- 3 Kolstad v. American Dental Ass'n, 527U.S. 526 (1999).
- 431 Cal. 4th 1026 (2003).
I found [the course] very interesting and VERY informative — it kept your attention, the time went by pretty quick too.
International Coffee & Bean Learner

International Coffee & Bean
Learner